Appropriate distance b2t rib binding site & ATG?
Stefan Gruenert (WCI)
sg124 at mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Wed Jun 1 12:56:56 EST 1994
Huanquan Zheng from Helsinki wrote:
>I wondered whether the distance of 15bp is suitable or not.
I assume we're talking about eukaryotic ribosomes here and the rib
binding site is the cap structure on an eukaryotic message, yes ?
In that case there is a reference from big translation Mama Kozak in
'Gene Expression (1991) Vol. 1, No. 2:pp 111-115, "A short leader
sequence impairs the fidelity of initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes".
No wonder you never heard of the Journal as it is at least a bit obscure.
Therefore I describe briefly the findings:
Experiments in vitro (wheat germ),
capped message with two AUGs in the same reading frame, so you can
measure how many ribosomes start at the first and second AUG.
The leader was 3, 6, 9, 12, 32 nt long before the first AUG.
She found that up to 12 nt initiation upstream was inefficient
(about similar product yield from both AUGs), and with 32 nt she got 100%
My gut feeling from four years in vitro translation is she's right, even
though she hid the paper in some inaccessible place for nobody to check
the gels. So you might be a bit on the short side with your 15 nt long
leader. But it depends what you want to do, I guess. For in vivo I'm sure
you'll be fine with an even shorter leader (The shortest 5'untranslated
region in a natural mRNA (known to me) is 7 nt), if you need only "some"
But if it's not necessary why risk it and put in an extra 15 nt.
Sorry for rambling on but it would be much easier if the question would
be a bit more precise. For example if you're talking about internal
ribosome entry like on EMCV, or polio mRNA, which carry a ribosome
binding site forget what I said above and mail me for advise on these,
good luck to everybody reading this,
Stefan Grunert sg124 at mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
More information about the Methods