IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

PCR fidelity

Frank Chen yatsen at wam.umd.edu
Thu Dec 21 20:11:22 EST 1995

On Thu, 21 Dec 1995, Ned Mantei wrote:

> In article <4b9cu7$i26 at thorn.cc.usm.edu>, rbateman at ocean.st.usm.edu
> (Robert Bateman) wrote:
> > I have a graduate student who is using RT-PCR to amplify a large section 
> > of the coding region (75%) of a peptide processing enzyme from several 
> > mammalian species. We intend to sequence these and compare the sequences 
> > to identify conserved residues. His committee is concerned about the 
> > fidelity of Taq polymerase even though he is directly sequencing the PCR 
> > products. 
> If he is *directly* sequencing the PCR products, without cloning them,
> then he is reading the *average* sequence. The 0.1% or less errors at each
> position never show up. 

It may not be true.
It is probably true that errors in Cycle sequencing will not affect the 
final sequencing result of a pool of template samples.  However, the 
error in initial PCR reaction could show up IF the starting material is 
minimal.  Errors in early amplification cycles can accumulate and generate a 
pool of templates as the final PCR product.  It is just like statistical 
analysis: the average is meanless if the sample number is not big enough.

But, I agree that sequencing the PCR product directly will have much 
better chance in reviewing the real sequence.

>There would only be a problem if the polymerase
> always made a mistake at >25% or so frequency at one particular position,
> something for which there is no evidence at all. The problems with
> mistaken incorporation arise when one looks at individual clones. I don't
> think the committee understands the problem.
> -- 
> Ned Mantei
> Dept. of Neurobiology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
> CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
> mantei at neuro.biol.ethz.ch   Fax: +41-1-633-1046
Finally, high fidelity Pol may reduce the error rates to a point.  But, 
the final answer to this kind of question is to compare your sequence to 
the genomic sequence.

Frank Chen

More information about the Methods mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net