Your response hurt my feelings. But then I DID CHECK THE TEXTS.
"The sense strand is the strand that is transcribed into mRNA and
therefore is the anti-parellel complement of the mRNA"
THIS IS NOT WHAT MY TEXTS SAY:
Check out BIOCHEMISTRY, 3rd ed. (1988) L. Stryer, ed. page 705:
"...These designations refer to the coding (sense) strand, not the
template (antisense) strand, of DNA; the coding strand has the same
sequence as the RNA transcript except for T in place of U."
GENES IV, 4th ed. (1990) Ben Lewin, ed. page 113:
"The DNA strand that bears the same sequence as the mRNA (except for
possessing T instead of U) is called the coding strand."
Coding = sense = same sequence as transcribed RNA
Noncoding = antisense = complementary to transcribed RNA
If you want an argument,I wouldn't take on Lubert Stryer or Ben Lewin
(editor of CELL).
Now, I haven't looked up your references (which, by the way, are ancient)
but if they do say what you claim, then you should consider updating your
lecture notes to the more recently accepted definitions.
I don't teach molecular biology- they don't allow grad students to do
those kinds of things- but I did take biochemistry from Robert Sinsheimer
at UCSB and since he passed me on my oral exams this past June, I guess
he didn't find any serious gaps in my knowledge. On the other hand, he
didn't ask me that question. I guess it's assumed we should know that.
I didn't want a flame-war, but, really, if you want to argue about
something, perhaps it shouldn't be on something as semantically ambiguous
On Fri, 22 Dec
1995, Stephen R. Lasky wrote:
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 10:19:16 -0400
> From: Stephen R. Lasky <Stephen_Lasky at brown.edu>
> To: methods at net.bio.net> Subject: Re: current protocols in protein science
>> After posting the criticism listed below on the internet, I got an
> immediate fax from Eric M. Graber of Wiley publishing, apoligizing for the
> problems that I was having. The next day he faxed me new Key codes so
> that I could get into the program. Unfortunately, I have been too busy
> repeating experiments to make them pretty for a publication, so I haven't
> had a chance to get into the program. You might want to give Eric a call
> at 212-850-8848. He seems quite repsonsive.
>> The internet really works sometimes.
>>> > In article <9511290453.AA07046 at uranus.med.pitt.edu>,
> > corey at MED.PITT.EDU (Seth Corey) wrote:
> > > any comments? is it worth the price?
> > I'd like to know also. The publishers sent me a copy on approval but the
> > Key they included won't open it up. I have been trying to get a look at
> > it and have contacted them several times but their only replies have been
> > to send me bills for the disk. Needless to say, I am displeased with
> > their responses and probably will not purchase it because of this. Maybe
> > someone from CP on CD will read this mssg and get their customer service
> > department in gear.
> > SRLasky
> > *****
> > I have also had a lot of problems with John Wiley & Sons about
> > Current Protocols - CD versions. First, it didn't come for a long
> > time. When it finally arrived, the key wouldn't open it up. It took
> > way too many phone calls to straighten up these problems. Then,
> > I had some other technical problems. Finally, another disk arrived,
> > and I got two bills, which took a long time to straighten up. I
> > think they have a lot of problems with their distributions
> > and customer service departments.
> > Glenn CAntor
> Stephen R. Lasky Ph.D. Brown U/Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, RI.
> Phone: 401-456-5672 Fax: 401-456-6569 e:mail: Stephen_Lasky at brown.edu> ===================================================================
> America may be unique in being a country which has leapt from barbarism to decadence without touching civilization. John O'Hara.