EtBr staining: A third option
BCRUBIN at weizmann.weizmann.ac.il
BCRUBIN at weizmann.weizmann.ac.il
Sun Mar 5 04:46:58 EST 1995
I used a third option, but cannot say it will work 100%. U can add very dilute
d EtBr (maybe with the loading solution), and reduce the total amount of EtBr a
1000 fold. By adding 1ul EtBr(1:1000) from the recommended consentration gave
me strong bands. For comparison, I will add 2ul for a 40ml gel of the 1:1 solu
tion.
I anly tried this a couple of time so far since I stopped runing gels for a m
onth. Be glad to hear other people's opinion.
*******************************************************************************
Eitan Rubin the 3rd *
* Plant genetics *
* The weizmann Inst of Science *
* Rehovot, Israel *
* Tel: 972-8-342421 *
* Email: bcrubin at dapsas1.weizmann.ac.il *
* *
*******************************************************************************
In article <3ig2cn$28d at gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
ah690549 at bcm.tmc.edu (Annette C. Hollmann) writes:
>In article <9502221107.aa21779 at etsuodt.etsu.edu> betts at ORION.ETSU.EDU (GORDON BETTS) writes:
>>It seems to me there are two options for visualizing DNA in agarose gels:
>>run a gel with EtBr in the gel or staining the gel after the run. What are
>>the relative merits of the two methods?
>
>Running a gel with EtBr requires less total EtBr, and it is not so messy.
>Also, you don't have to wait those extra five minutes to get your data ;-)
>The only problem is that your gelbox will be contaminated with EtBr.
>
>If you stain the gel after the run, your gelbox will stay clean , and you
>can reuse the EtBr Solution.
>
>Annette
>ah690549 at mbcr.bcm.tmc.edu
>
>>
>
>
More information about the Methods
mailing list