DNA prep for transient transfection

seppen at amc.uva.nl seppen at amc.uva.nl
Mon Mar 6 12:49:53 EST 1995


In Article <nick.5.2F559DCF at lmb1.rug.ac.be>
nick at lmb1.rug.ac.be writes:
>Hi there,
>
>As a coincidence, we had a discussion only yesterday about problems with low 
>efficiencies of transient transfections in our lab.
>
>More precisely, transfections using the DEAE-dextrane method seem to give very 
>variable results, given one plasmid preparation to another.
>
>The low efficiency is independent of the person, the acceptor cells or the DNA 
>itself. In fact...the problem seems to be the preparation method used. Sorry 
>to tell you so, but this all began when we started using QIAGEN columns!
>
>I am not trying to start a "WIZARD (TM)"-like hystery here. We just want to 
>know if other people have experienced similar problems, and if there is any 
>solution to this. Especially if you want to compare two different genes, this 
>varying efficiencies really make it a mess.
>
>I hope someone has an answer to this problem.
>
>	Greetings,
>
>	Nick
>
>Laboratory of Molecular Biology
>University of Gent
>BELGIUM
>Nick at lmb1.rug.ac.be
>

Hi nick,

we had a similar problem with obtaining stable transfectants. I now routinely
do one phenol and two chloroform/iaa exctractions after the maxiprep with
qiagen. The interfase always contains protein, so qiagen is probably not
enough to get pure vector.

Greetings,
Jurgen Seppen
Amsterdam
The Netherlands





More information about the Methods mailing list