Qiagen preps in transient transfections are OK
Ian A. York
york at mbcrr.dfci.harvard.edu
Thu Mar 9 19:40:27 EST 1995
A few days ago there was a question as to whether Qiagen preps worked in
transient transfections, and it was supported -
In article <3jfav3$n2e at amcnix.amc.uva.nl> seppen at amc.uva.nl writes:
>
>we had a similar problem with obtaining stable transfectants. I now routinely
>do one phenol and two chloroform/iaa exctractions after the maxiprep with
>qiagen. The interfase always contains protein, so qiagen is probably not
>enough to get pure vector.
I grew up a prep for Qiagen, and used my neighbor's LiCl prep; in
the past I ran this beside a CsCl prep, and those two were similar. The
plasmid contains H-2Dd in pCDM8; I transfected the two preps into COS7 by
the DEAE-dextran method, and two days later I stained for surface
expression of H-2Dd and ran the samples through FACS.
The efficiency was essentially identical: 25% transfected with the
Qiagen were positive, 21% of the LiCl transfectants were positive. These
are typical numbers in my hands, with this technique - I generally get
between 20 - 30% expression. There was no difference in intensity of
staining, either.
I did nothing special to the Qiagen prep - no phenol-chloroform
or anything.
So, at least here, there doesn't seem to be a big problem with
the Qiagen kit. It's possible that there is a new formulation that
hasn't reached us yet, but we go through a fair number of these kits.
Ian
--
Ian York (york at mbcrr.harvard.edu)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St., Boston MA 02115
Phone (617)-632-4328 Fax (617)-632-2627
More information about the Methods
mailing list