ARGs: -70 or room temp?
dalrymple at pplros.demon.co.uk
Fri Nov 24 05:37:23 EST 1995
In article <1995Nov23.091126.1 at leif> ROGER GREEN, roger at kean.ucs.mun.ca
>Subject: ARGs: -70 or room temp?
>From: ROGER GREEN, roger at kean.ucs.mun.ca
>Date: 23 Nov 95 09:11:26 -0330
>> Has anyone actually compared exposing autorads at -70 and at room
>temperature to see if there is any difference in signal intensity in practice.
> We usually use -70, because that what everybody else does; but I
>have a feeling that it doesn't make much, if any difference, in practice.
> It would be good to see some data on this.
>Roger C. Green, Faculty of Medicine Phone: (709)737-6884
>Memorial University , St. John's, Newfoundland FAX : (709)737-7010
Stone the heretic!! ;-)
Whilst I've never systematically compared ARGs side by side, with and w/o
I have exposed filters with strong signals at room temp e.g. over the
in order not to have to come in on saturday. In my opinion there is a
Why don't YOU try it?
More information about the Methods