which electroporator ?
klenchin at macc.wisc.edu
Thu Sep 28 17:06:27 EST 1995
In article <44evhs$lfn at elna.ethz.ch>, Sasha Kraev <kraev at bc.biol.ethz.ch>
>We are the happy users of the (expensive) version, called EasyJect Plus
>from a Belgian company EquiBio.
>if you can afford to spend about $10 000 and use
>it collectively, this is probably the best device I know.
Is it the one that has double pulse capability (first - poration,
then electrophoresis)? If it is, I would think it should (with some
tweaking) result in a higher transfection efficiency.
More information about the Methods