which electroporator ?

Dima Klenchin klenchin at macc.wisc.edu
Thu Sep 28 17:06:27 EST 1995


In article <44evhs$lfn at elna.ethz.ch>, Sasha Kraev <kraev at bc.biol.ethz.ch> 
wrote:
>We are the happy users of the (expensive) version, called EasyJect Plus 
>from a Belgian company EquiBio. 
.
>if you can afford to spend about $10 000 and use
>it collectively, this is probably the best device I know.

Is it the one that has double pulse capability (first - poration, 
then electrophoresis)? If it is, I would think it should (with some
tweaking) result in a higher transfection efficiency. 

- Dima 




More information about the Methods mailing list