license for TAQ

Bernard Murray bernard at elsie.nci.nih.gov
Tue Apr 16 18:07:27 EST 1996


In article <alexanderw.1180076318D at newssrv.dcrt.nih.gov>, 
alexanderw at cber.cber.fda.gov says...
>
>In Article <1996Apr16.182343.25425 at alw.nih.gov>, bernard at elsie.nci.nih.gov
>(Bernard Murray) wrote:
>>In article <fn3jpEAP+1cxEwMV at genesys.demon.co.uk>, 
duncan at genesys.demon.co.uk 
>>says...

[Legal pros and cons of Taq debate excised]

>Have you read any patents?  Many are very good scientific papers which a lot
>of researchers could learn from.
>Regards,
>Bill Alexander
>alexanderw at cber.cber.fda.gov
>
>     "640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates, 1981


Is it true that FDA still gives a big bonus to anyone that comes up with
something that can be patented?  Maybe that would explain our differences
of opinion.

			Bernard
Bernard Murray, Ph.D.
bernard at elsie.nci.nih.gov  (National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda MD, USA)

"Java is there to destroy all we've achieved..." -- Bill Gates, 1996




More information about the Methods mailing list