DNA gel extraction

Taek H. You tyou at postbox.acs.ohio-state.edu
Sat Aug 17 14:04:44 EST 1996

In article <DwAAz9.K6M.B.midge at bath.ac.uk> bspwrb at bath.ac.uk (W R BENNETT) writes:
>Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts
>From: bspwrb at bath.ac.uk (W R BENNETT)
>Subject: Re: DNA gel extraction
>Organization: School of Biological Sciences, University of Bath, UK
>Message-ID: <DwAAz9.K6M.B.midge at bath.ac.uk>
>References: <4ulg9s$q7h at mark.ucdavis.edu> <3213A2DE.70CC at lac.jci.tju.edu>
>Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 13:33:09 GMT
>Lines: 17

>ehwang at ucdavis.edu wrote:

>> I frequently use a gel extraction method where I poke a hole at the
>> bottom of a .5 ml tume and plug some whatman with T.E. to spin a gel
>> through to extract DNA.  Does anyone know where this technique came
>> from?  Original publication would be nice.
>> Thanks in advance.
>Is this any different or better than using glass wool to plug the eppendorf 


>Bill Bennett
>W.R.BENNETT at bath.ac.uk

I tried both. In my hand, 3M filter paper is easier and faster. Both are good 
convinient methods, though.
Any one can try both side by side since it takes only a few minutes. Then, 
decide which one is better or easier.
I think it's the milage on individual in my opinion.

More information about the Methods mailing list