cleavage of MBP fusion proteins
Mark Brandt, Ph.D.
mark at indy-lv.biomol.uci.edu
Mon Aug 26 21:40:52 EST 1996
In article <32222346.7A7F at slip.net>, GBasi at slip.net wrote:
> We have repeatedly attempted to cleave the maltose binding protein from
> our fusion proteins of interest using factor XA and found that the
> cleaved MBP no longer binds to amylose. Has anyone out there
> encountered this same problem and if so, how were you able to overcome
> it? (P.S. The fusion protein itself is able to bind amylose resin
> before cleavage, just not after cleavage with factor XA).
> please reply to gbasi at slip.net, thanks for your help.
I am not sure that I can really answer this -- Factor Xa doesn't cleave my
construct effectively. Using other cleavage methods (trypsin or
hydroxylamine) I have gotten more complete cleavage. Following cleavage
the MBP tends to bind the amylose resin poorly, but this may be due to the
presence of maltose in the binding site; if I subject the MBP (or fusion
protein) to more than one chromatography step in between amylose columns,
I usually get good binding of the MBP to the amylose, so I suspect that
the MBP is somewhat reluctant to release the maltose.
To answer your "overcome it" question, I generally have better results
separating the MBP from my (cleaved) protein by gel filtration, rather
than amylose chromatography.
--
Mark Brandt, Ph.D.
My opinions are my own, but I tend to give them away to anyone who fails to flee fast enough.
More information about the Methods
mailing list