Other minipreps (was Re: Qiagen: This is ridiculous)
Robert Seymour
r.seymour at prospect.anprod.csiro.au
Wed Aug 28 22:55:54 EST 1996
In article <50254c$1lqs at piglet.cc.uic.edu>,
levenson at uic.edu (Victor Levenson) wrote:
>sharmaa at acsu.buffalo.edu wrote:
>
>>I havent expereinecsIan A. York wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been using Qiagen DNA preps for years. The quality
is great; as
>>> everyone who's used them knows, though, the yield is at
best
>>> inconsistent. At random intervals, and for no apparent
reason, there
>[stuff deleted]
>>> Blowing off steam,
>>>
>>> Ian
>
>>I have had low or no yields with Qia-miniprep spin
columns! I will be
>>doing a comparison of Qiagen midiprep with PrimmLabs kit
soon. Will
>>post the results.
>>
>>Name: Ashu Sharma
>>E-mail: sharmaa at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
>On the same subject:
>
>Has anyone tried mimipreps from "5'-3'" which they call
>"Perfect-Prep"? And/Or from Princeton Separations (forgot
the name
>for this one)? The tech people for both companies claim
better than
>CsCL ("and other kits" - no names, though) purity and
yield, but what
>is your experience? The applications I am mostly interested
in are
>TRANSFECTIONS and AUTO Sequencing (for screening by RE
digest nothing
>beats phenol-chloroform ;-)!)
>
>If you want to e-mail I can summarize and post the gist of
the
>responses.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Victor
>levenson at uic.edu
>
Dear All
As we are discussing miniprep protocols I thought I might
mention the protocol that I've just seen in biotechniques.
It is an alkaline lysis followed by a PEG 6000 precipitation
of the DNA followed by a LiCl precipitation of RNA and
protein away from the DNA. The authors claim that this
gives sequenceable DNA. I have not tried this method yet
but will probably do so in the next week or so. The
reference is BioTechniques Vol 21 pages 233-235.
Robert
More information about the Methods
mailing list