Qiagen: This is ridiculous
Frank Murphy
f-murphy at uiuc.edu
Wed Aug 28 14:09:06 EST 1996
In article <32241234.24B5 at nott.ac.uk>, Nigel.Kenward at nott.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
> Yep, me too.
> We went back to the old GeneClean kit and then started to make our own
version (from the
> original PNAS reference. We can't call it by the original name, but it
is the same I reckon.
> Yields are CONSISTENTLY good, honest.
> Full reference at:
> http://www.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk/~mbzspd/methods/Gene-Kleen_protocol.html
>
> courtesy of Dr Simon Dawson who has trouble shooted this. P.S. Use TBE
in the gel for best
> results.
> Good Luck,
> Nigel
> --
> ____ ___
> |\ | | / \ / | NIGEL KENWARD,
> | \ | | | ___ |__ | Dept. Biochemistry,
> | \ | | | | | | Nottingham University Medical School.
> | \| | \____/ \___ |___ Clifton Boulevard.
> ------------------------------- Nottingham. NG7 2UH.
> Tel (0115 924 9924) ext 44789 Fax (0115 942 2225)
> email:mbxnjk at vax.nott.ac.uk "You can tell me.......I'm a doctor"
I've had similar problems, especially with the midi and maxi preps.
Luckily I have managed to avoid needing large amounts of DNA, but I have
run accross an alternate protocol for midi preps using Qiagen columns,
supposedly more reliably. The address is
http://research.nwfsc.noaa.gov/protocols/
--
Frank Murphy
f-murphy at uiuc.edu
More information about the Methods
mailing list