Using Resources - Apology.
klenchin at macc.wisc.edu
Sat Feb 17 13:54:53 EST 1996
In article <zjons-1702961455510001 at 126.96.36.199>,
zjons at vetbio.unizh.ch (Zophonias O. Jonsson) wrote:
->In article <4g2jm0$8no_001 at biochem.wisc.edu>, klenchin at macc.wisc.edu (Dima
->> And I feel like those "heated responses" are ridiculous. As you pointed out,
->> there is _no_ appropriate ng for biomol jobs. There isn't many job hunting
->> posts on b.m.m-r. Therefore, they can't be viewed as a sourse of noise in
->> group (especially when keeping in mind that traffic is not really heavy).
->> Folks, please, don't fight the problem that does not exist.
->> If there will be too many posts like yours, it will just indicate the need
->> for the separate group, which will be (I'm sure) immediately created. This
->> the way usenet evolves.
->bionet.jobs.wanted does indeed exist and I counted 99 actual postings
->there. I am not sure if it is an effective way to find a job, but the
->group is there and it seems to be very appropriate for biomol jobs.
Wait, did you look at posts? At best, 30% there really belongs to biomol!
(O.K., thet's _my_ opinion).
->all the posts there were posted to this group I think it would be at least
->a small problem. Let's face it, there's a lot of young people looking for
->jobs out there and until now they have not posted to methds-reagnts. If
->people generally want postings like this it's fine, but that should at
->least be discussed. I would vote against it. Let's stay focused.
100% agree here. Should be discussed. I would vote pro unless strictly moderated
*.biomol.jobs (or something like this) is created.
More information about the Methods