Amersham Hybond N problem
vilimf01 at mcrcr6.med.nyu.edu
vilimf01 at mcrcr6.med.nyu.edu
Sat Mar 2 15:50:22 EST 1996
In article <schulzb.8.003FC787 at pz350.ipsp.uni-hohenheim.de>, schulzb at pz350.ipsp.uni-hohenheim.de (BRITTA SCHULZ) writes:
> Who can help me to find out, which company produces the uncharged membrane
> formerly sold by Amersham as Hybond N ?
> The problem is , they are now selling a new membrane, calling it Hybond N as
> well, but it is very different. However, since we have the new Hybond N all
> we get is black autoradiographs ( we are using the Dig-system) The new
> membrane is very thick and stiff, it doesn't look like nylon
> at all, and it is produced by another manufacturer. Since I would like to go
> on with my work without too much delay and the Amersham people did not want
> to tell me their former supplier, maybe someone here knows something.
>
> Thank you very much in advance
>
> Britta
I just recieved something from MSI (http://www.msifilters.com)
saying that Amersham had replaced its supplier and implied that that
its MAGNA membrane would give the same results as the the old Amersham
Hybond-N membranes. But MSI has changed its manufacturing protocol
recently, and several netters noted problems with this switch. It
changed its protocols due to a patent infringement lawsuit by Pall
corp, so pall may be the best source of a replacement since they
probably supplied Amersham and use the old protocol for manufacture.
It was also posted on this newsgroup recently that they were a favored
supplier.
Usual Disclaimers, SVEN
More information about the Methods
mailing list