NP-40 replacement?
John A. Newitt
newitt at removeme.nih.gov
Fri Aug 1 15:41:42 EST 1997
In article <3.0.32.19970725101517.00727500 at imm2.imm.uth.tmc.edu>,
dhavilan at IMM2.IMM.UTH.TMC.EDU ("David L. Haviland, Ph.D.") wrote:
> I've been doing immunoprecipitations for many years and have done IEFs as
> well. Last I recall, there is not a major chemical difference between NP40
> and TX100 and for doing membrane extractions and IP, they are operationally
> interchangable. I'm sure I'll get an argument, but in all my years of
> dealing with NP40 vs TX100, I firmly believe you could make the
> substitution without seeing a difference in your experiment. I'm sure
> there are some applications where the substitution couldn't be made but
> membrane extracionts isn't one of them.
I concur.
Regards,
John A. Newitt, Ph.D. | <newitt at removeme.nih.gov>
National Institutes of Health | FAX: 301-402-0387
Bethesda, Maryland USA |
Please delete "removeme." from my address to reply by email.
More information about the Methods
mailing list