SmaI site gone!?
Ian A. York
iayork at panix.com
Mon Sep 22 09:21:47 EST 1997
In article <605squ$8e0_001 at leeds.ac.uk>, T.J. Young <BMBTJY at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
>into a different plasmid. Well, seeing as I ligated it in at SmaI sites I
>thought I would excise it at the SmaI sites but they appear to have gone!?
You don't explicitly say so, but I assume that SmaI was in your insert as
well as your vector, and you didn't use some other blunt-cutter on your
insert. If so, I Have Heard (but never tested) that SmaI produces
"ragged" blunt ends. Perhaps this is to blame. However, it isn't
something I've seen myself, and the only support I can give to the concept
is that on occasion SmaI has been hard to ligate into, and has been
improved (apparently) when I blunted the (putatively already blunt) ends.
Ian York (iayork at panix.com) <http://www.panix.com/~iayork/>
"-but as he was a York, I am rather inclined to suppose him a
very respectable Man." -Jane Austen, The History of England
More information about the Methods