Which should be CIPed, 7K one or 3K one?
Patrick F.H. Lai
pfhlai at LOOKSMART.COM
Wed Aug 26 00:25:15 EST 1998
---- Begin Original Message ----
> I am to link a 3K fragment with a 7k one. They were cut out by >ScaI from two plasmids
>derived from pBluscript SK(+). I considered that one should treated >with CIP to prevent it from
>self-circlized. So, which should be CIPed?
>Thank you for your advice.
> _____ ________ _______ _______ _ Yang Sheng
> __ / / /_ __ `/_ __ \__ __ `/ Shanghai Inst. of Biochem.
> _ /_/ / / /_/ /_ / / /_ /_/ / Academia Sinica,320 Yueyang Rd.
> _\__, / \__,_/ /_/ /_/ _\__, / Shanghai 200031,P.R.China
> /____/ /____/ Tel: 86-21-6437-4430ext.243
---- End Original Message ----
Dear Dr. Yang Sheng,
I am not sure if I fully understand the situation.
Sca I cuts the amp-resistance gene in pBSII(SK+)
I assume neither the 3k- nor the 7k-fragment contains sequences from
the vector(s). And, the 10k-fragment resulted will be inserted into
a vector later on. (Otherwise, the following is useless.)
I also assume you have both fragments already purified.
Now, I have two questions:
1. Can other restriction enzymes be used to release the fragments ?
These blunt ends drive me nuts sometimes.
2. Do you need to preserve the Sca I site where this ligation takes
If the answer to question 2 is 'NO', then i would suggest trying the
following procedures that I HAVE NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT aND NEVER TRIED
a. Add a 3'-overhanging T to both ends of one fragment with Taq polymerase and dTTP at 72'C.
b. Add 3'-overhanging A's to the other fragment with Taq and dATP...
This way, there's no need to CIP to prevent SELF-circularization,
and there will be good chance that the right ligation will take place.
(Not perfect, though. ~25% right, if the DNA stays linear.)
And, the 10k-fragment will probably circularize !
(CIP'ing either fragment will have the same problem, though.)
In order to obtain the properly linked linear 10k-fragment,
long PCR (using hi fi enzymes, of course) may be done.
The inappropriately ligated products will not be amplified as the
orientation will be wrong.
Sca I sites may be included in the primers, if necessary.
Cutting with Sca I again will give you the same terminals, but the
ligation site won't be cut as this Sca I site is now destroyed.
Now, the 10k-fragment can be ligated into your vector of choice as
Well, this is too darned complicated and expensive, eh ?
Yeah, I know. :-)
So, back to question 1 : can Sca I be replaced ?
Come to think of it, how about not worrying circularization and let
the 2 fragmeents ligate ? The proper linking is bound to happen.
Gel extract whatever is 10 kb, and PCR this DNA as described above.
I hope you don't need the halved Sca I sites at ends of the 10-kb fragments.
Hope this is useful info. :-)
Patrick F.H. Lai < PFHLai at looksmart.com >
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
or keep looking.
More information about the Methods