Which should be CIPed, 7K one or 3K one?
shengyang at USA.NET
Wed Aug 26 23:05:53 EST 1998
Many thanks for your kind help!
My question might be ambigious in some degree. How did I put myself into a blunt-end clone? It is
because that I was going to site-directed mutagenisis an enzyme by PCR. The gene of the enzyme is
on a plasmid of Bacillus subtilis, I found that it was hard to do cloning in Bacillus for its
effiency of transformation is rather low (<10*5). So I cloned the whole plasmid into pUC18 to
construct a shuttle plasmid and meanwhile the PCRed fragment which contains converted bases was
TA cloned into pBluescript SK(+). While, the original design was to replace the fragment by ScaI
and SalI. The ScaI is in the middle of the gene and SalI is behind the TAG. So, I should cut the
plasmids by ScaI to meet the two parts of gene. You know, the bla(ampR) contain the site of ScaI.
I had thought that ScaI and ligase could do all. I tried and tried, but I could not get the
recombinant plasmid :-(.
CIPing one of the fragments? Increasing transformation effiency (My competent cell is 10*7/ug
I think that the CIP question could be simplized into:
Which is easier to be self-circularized, 3k or 7k?
Dr. Hiranya Sankar Roychowdhury said:
>The scenario you describe does not need removal of PO4. Since the ori and
>the ampR have been separated, there is little chance of recovering anything
>else. Concatenation may be expected, but the desired plasmid will
>predominate. We routinely ligate and transform with plasmids >10kb, so it is
>not quite as unthinkable as people tend to believe. Hence, you should be
>able to obtain a large enough # of transformants to screen for the right
I wish so.
_____ ________ _______ _______ _ Yang Sheng
__ / / /_ __ `/_ __ \__ __ `/ Shanghai Inst. of Biochem.
_ /_/ / / /_/ /_ / / /_ /_/ / Academia Sinica,320 Yueyang Rd.
_\__, / \__,_/ /_/ /_/ _\__, / Shanghai 200031,P.R.China
/____/ /____/ Tel: 86-21-6437-4430ext.243
More information about the Methods