benedik at uh.edu
Fri Nov 6 17:03:34 EST 1998
In article <717ico$n04$1 at mserv2.dl.ac.uk>
"Wolfgang Schechinger" <Wolfgang.Schechinger at med.uni-tuebingen.de>
> Hello Martin,
> The story about Neomycin and G418 is this:
> 1. The NeoR gene is coding for neomycin phosphotransferase
> 2. Neomycin binds to ribosomes in certain Prokaryotes
> 3. G418 binds ... Eukaryotes
> 4. Neomycin phostransferase phosphorylates both G418 and Neomycin and
> renders them inactive.
> 5. G418 is only effectice in Eukaryotes
> 6. Neomycin ... Prokaryotes.
> This all is written down nowhere. It seems to be
> common sense <GG>.
> 7. Maybe those guys who are writing the catalogues are reading this
> message here and will include these hints in every catalogue.
> usual disclaimers apply * This message is RNAse free - please don't touch!
> Wolfgang Schechinger
> University of Tuebingen, Germany
> email: wgschech at med.uni-tuebingen.de * wwWait: http://www.medizin.uni-tuebingen.de/~wgschech/start.htm
Almost. G418 is effective against both Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes. It
was originally found (I think at Schering-Plough) as a standard
antibacterial anti-biotic. It was an exciting and wonderful new drug...
until they got to animal studies and all their mice died. Then they
found it works on both.
kanamycin and neomycin only work well in proks, and are interchangable
for E.coli work (kanamycin is much cheaper). Other bacteria do better
with one drug or the other. G418 is just too expensive to use for
bacteria but it would work fine.
Department of Biology and Biochemistry
University of Houston Tel: 713-743-8377
3201 Cullen Boulevard, HSC 402 Fax: 713-743-8351
Houston, TX 77204-5513 email: benedik at uh.edu
More information about the Methods