What digital camara is good for gel pictures?
se15 at le.ac.uk
Fri Sep 24 10:37:27 EST 1999
I have recently moved to a new lab where there is a Kodak DC120 camera and
The image quality form the camera is excellent....BUT it takes an age to
take a picture/ download it to the computer/ print. You don't mind this if
every picture you take is going to be published but in 99% of cases you just
want something to stick in your lab book .
In my previous lab we had a video camera system (custom built by a company
that's not supplying
anymore). With the video camera, image capture/printing is instantaneous and
the pictures are of publication quality.
With the digital camera you find that that you have to capture /dowload a
few times (in order to get it perfect) as the camera just takes a snap shot
and you don't know if the exposure is right until you download it. With a
video camera the picture is live so you can adjust focus/exposure in real
time) also with the digital you can't zoom into an area of interest....... I
found the video camera system to be very flexible for this (I also had a
powerful zoom lens for it and used to use it to take "macro" pictures of in
situ hybridisation/antibody stained slides)
If I were going to set up a system from scratch I would choose a video
(rather than still digital) camera and use the software from a company
called Phoretix. I don't think they directly supply the cameras but the last
time I spoke to one of their reps he said they can advise on what hardware
to buy. (I'm sure this would be cheaper than buying a complete package from
a company as these days computers/ storage devices(e.g CD writer or ZIP
drive) are very cheap... All you need extra is the video camera frame
grabber board and software.
Peter wrote in message ...
>In article <37EADFB8.692EFB7C at home.com>, glpf.guy at home.com wrote:
>> We are looking into purchasing a digital camera for taking pictures of
>> SDS gels and western blots (not commercial equipment such as stuff from
>> Bio-rad etc.). We would like a camera that is relatively easy to use
>> and set up for such purposes, and provide good resolution pictures
>> (publishable quality). Plus it should be Mac compatible (we are a Mac
>Look at the professional line of DCS cammeras from Kodak. They are just
>about the best cammera on the market and can easily be put on a cmount to
>look at cells. They are not all that cheap but they are good. The reason
>I say this is because you want publishable quality which means $$$$$$
More information about the Methods