Ethidium Bromide -Vapors!!!

Peter pxpst2 at
Tue Sep 28 09:51:49 EST 1999

I think the poster was joking and even with my often crude sense of humor,
I found the comment/joke to be pretty strange.  It should have been posted
to alt.tastless.humor.
  In our lab, we have a very pregnant lady and she is very aware of the
nasty chemicals around as are all who work in the lab.  If she feels at
all uncomfortable with any chemical, then she can ask anyone of us to deal
with it (no one in our lab feels like she is pushing off any work on us). 
When we have particularly nasty chemicals out and or radiation around, we
inform her and tell her she should leave.  As a father and a greek(to
greeks, family IS the most important thing), I would consider us to be
callous if we did anything less for her and her child. 

Peter Pediaditakis
University of Pittsburgh

In article <852567FA.004A4331.00 at>,
Bill_A_Nussbaumer at wrote:

> >> Incidentally, the technical officer in question is now heavily pregnant,
> >> and I will be happy to provide a list of birth defects to methods-reagents
> >> after the delivery.
> I find your statement here to be both callous and potentially
misleading.  Would
> you please clarify what you mean by this?  Was this an "off the cuff" remark
> meant to be a joke?  Your serious opinion as to the results of the technicians
> actions in the lab?  Or is there actually prenatal evidence that this
> will give birth to a child with birth defects?  And of course I wouldn't
> you if you said that it was "known" that ethidium bromide was the cause.  It's
> not really my intention to be terse, and I certainly don't want to
suggest that
> "universal precaution" isn't the best way to approach potentially
dangerous lab
> chemicals.  However, this could be a serious issue for many women who work in
> the laboratory and unqualified statements such as this could be misleading to
> someone who was genuinely trying to research the issue.

More information about the Methods mailing list