blunt cloning of PCR fragments
John Dixon
jpcd100 at mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Tue Aug 1 06:06:30 EST 2000
In article <v04011700b5ab52e0c37d@[144.92.64.174]>, Michael L. Sullivan
<mlsulliv at facstaff.wisc.edu> wrote:
> I've been trying to blunt-end clone some PCR fragments without much
> success. Controls lead me to beleive that there isn't problem with the
> ligase or ligation condition. The PCR fragments were generated using
> KlenTaq LA from Sigma. Since the enzyme mix is supposed to have a 3' to 5'
> proofreading activity, I figured the fragments should be coming out of the
> reaction with blunt ends. Am I wrong about that? Should I go ahead and
> polish up the ends in a separate step anyway? Thanks for your input.
>
I recently tried cloning four different Expand Hifi (Roche - Taq+Pwo I
think) generated bands into 2 of Invitrogens Topo cloning kits, 1 for
blunts (ordered by accident) and the followup T tailed version. I got
virtually nothing using the blunt cloning vector, and plenty on the T
tailed one. I think Taq wins the battle over whether a terminal A is
added or not, on the majority of termini. FWIW, I also included a
similar fragment that had been Qiaquicked and stored at -20 for a
couple of weeks, it also worked v poorly in the blunt vector so I guess
that the As stay on for a week or two at least.
Cheers
JD
--
John Dixon Lab 44 (1223) 334131
Wellcome/CRC Institute Fax 44 (1223) 334089
Cambridge University
United Kingdom CB2 1QR e-m: jpcd100 at mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
More information about the Methods
mailing list