Building the $100 Thermocycler
Dr. Duncan Clark
Duncan at nospam.demon.co.uk
Thu Feb 3 04:18:44 EST 2000
In article <389822E2.2D860BAE at imm2.imm.uth.tmc.edu>, David L. Haviland
<dhavilan at imm2.imm.uth.tmc.edu> writes
>If it is being done for education or even the low/no budget lab, why
>would they (Roche) even care? I figure they'd want to be the supplier
>of the Taq used in the home-grown instrument!
>I can't see what would be gained if Roche, hypothetically of course,
>were to legally go after a high school or "college of timbucktu" for
>making a manual or semi-manual cycler? Doing so would be bad public
>relations and make the Goliath (Roche) out to be more of a spoiled-sport
Wrong company. :(
The owner of the machine patents is Perkin Elmer. It is to them that one
must go to for a machine license. Confusing isn't it!
The problem with being on the cutting edge is that you occasionally get
sliced from time to time....
More information about the Methods