Rudi van de Wetering
ReplyToButNoSpamR.vandewetering at czzorlnm.azn.nl
Fri Nov 17 11:23:18 EST 2000
> I am amplifying a peptide receptor in rat prostate and typically get the
> predicted product of 500 bp. However, there is usually a minor band at
> 600 bp. I never gave this much thought since there is a possible false
> priming site, which would give a minor product at that size. However,
> the other week I surveyed several tissues and discovered that in some
> tissues this minor product was absent or greatly reduced while in one
> tissue (spleen) the minor product was much more prevalent than the 500
> bp product.
> Great, I thought ? alternate splicing or some related but new receptor.
> However, when I gel purified the 600 bp band from spleen and then
> reamplified it, what I got was a major product at 500 bp and a minor
> product at 600 bp. So it looks like false priming again. But why would I
> see tissue specificity for false priming and the minor product?
> Any ideas from you PCR aficionados out there?
Have you sequenced both products to see what they really are? That would
help before we start of speculating.
More information about the Methods