100% ethanol

Richard P. Grant rgrant at netscape.net
Mon Sep 11 02:42:16 EST 2000


In article <8pgca0$eol$1 at justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk>, "Martin Chan" 
<s987517 at mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk> wrote:

> Dear all,
>       I was told (without explanation) to use 99.7% instead of 100% 
>       ethanol
> in DNA precipitation. Is there any reasons behind?
> 

Tax?

-- 
Richard P. Grant MAD Phil        http://www.gerbil.org.uk/    
Please reply to rpg 'at' mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk'

         Sex and bugs and rock and roll






More information about the Methods mailing list