100% ethanol
Richard P. Grant
rgrant at netscape.net
Mon Sep 11 02:42:16 EST 2000
In article <8pgca0$eol$1 at justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk>, "Martin Chan"
<s987517 at mailserv.cuhk.edu.hk> wrote:
> Dear all,
> I was told (without explanation) to use 99.7% instead of 100%
> ethanol
> in DNA precipitation. Is there any reasons behind?
>
Tax?
--
Richard P. Grant MAD Phil http://www.gerbil.org.uk/
Please reply to rpg 'at' mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk'
Sex and bugs and rock and roll
More information about the Methods
mailing list