SacII ?

Nick Theodorakis nicholas_theodorakis at urmc.rochester.edu
Wed Apr 4 08:59:17 EST 2001


In <3ACB0F33.22970.D6CEF5 at localhost>, Viczian Andras wrote:
>
>
>I think the trick is that the SstI is the isoschisomer of SacI not 
>SacII.
>

Correct. SacI and SstI are isoschizomers, as are SacII and SstII.

Nick


-- 
Nick Theodorakis
nicholas_theodorakis at urmc.rochester.edu




More information about the Methods mailing list