cloning of PCR products - errors?

Kristo K M Kulju kulju at
Fri Jun 22 07:48:31 EST 2001

"Frank O. Fackelmayer" <Frank at> writes:

> "Richard P. Grant" wrote:
> > 
> > > errors but what about cloning procedure? Is is considered to be
> > > practically "error free"?
> > Yes.  That's why it's called 'cloning'.
> agreed, it is CONSIDERED to be error free. But of course it is not. Bugs

Thanks for the help! Does anybody know references about this? Something I 
could cite if I want to say that Taq-errors are more probable reason of 
point-mutation artefacts than cloning.


More information about the Methods mailing list