cloning of PCR products - errors?
Kristo K M Kulju
kulju at sirppi.helsinki.fi
Fri Jun 22 07:48:31 EST 2001
"Frank O. Fackelmayer" <Frank at Fackelmayer.de> writes:
> "Richard P. Grant" wrote:
> > > errors but what about cloning procedure? Is is considered to be
> > > practically "error free"?
> > Yes. That's why it's called 'cloning'.
> agreed, it is CONSIDERED to be error free. But of course it is not. Bugs
Thanks for the help! Does anybody know references about this? Something I
could cite if I want to say that Taq-errors are more probable reason of
point-mutation artefacts than cloning.
More information about the Methods