Alternative to RNAi?
C.Fritsch at DKFZ-Heidelberg.de
Fri Mar 21 06:50:08 EST 2003
A couple of months ago, a German scientist presented a method which was
based on RNA duplices coupled to a cell-permeable peptide. The fusion was
achieved through a linker that was somehow hydrolyzed within the cytoplasm,
thus a) releasing the duplex and b) inhibiting release of the complex from
the cytoplasm upon removal of the excess that was used in the culture medium
Unfortunately I don't have the details handy, but it should be possible to
"Ian A. York" <iayork at panix.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:b5b0su$d1c$1 at reader2.panix.com...
> In article <ze7ea.42$W4.5448 at news.uchicago.edu>,
> EK <khatipovNO-SPAM at NO-SPAMuchicago.edu> wrote:
> >"Ian A. York" <iayork at panix.com> wrote in message
> >> >clear enough. I have no doubts that RNAi are effective. I am more
> >> >about the final purpose - administration to patients, where liposone
> >> What on earth makes you think this is the "final purpose"? 99.999% of
> >> people using RNAi have no interest in this sort of thing.
> >So what do you think is the purpose of RNAi = gene silencing? At least if
> >you look at it from the point of view of justification of the aims of
> >research proposals that get funded? I certainly understand the functional
> >genomics aspect, but knowing the function of the gene is not the "final
> >purpose", isn't it? I am certainly not educated enough to judge. 99.999%
> Understanding the universe is the final purpose, as far as I'm concerned.
> I believe that targeted research has its place, but true advances in
> science--and in health--come from basic science, from advances in
> understanding. RNAi is a new and extreemly useful tool for understanding
> cell biology. It's a basic science technique. Complaining that a basic
> science technique is not useful for applied science is missing the point
> entirely. Just because Congresspeople do it, doesn't mean it's right.
> >Could you elaborate on that or give me a reference? Do you mean somebody
> >tried the RNAi coupled to linear peptides and failed?
> No, I mean that the mechanism of action of RNAi, as far as is known,
> requires free ends on the nucleic acid, and precise length. Both of those
> suggest that coupling to peptides should block RNAi effects.
> I know of no one who has tried to couple linear peptides to nucleic acids
> and either failed or succeeded. If there is someone, I certainly hope
> they have a mechanism in mind by which it could succeed and are not merely
> poking at things they don't understand, like a baboon in a 747.
> Ian York (iayork at panix.com) <http://www.panix.com/~iayork/>
> "-but as he was a York, I am rather inclined to suppose him a
> very respectable Man." -Jane Austen, The History of England
More information about the Methods