Automatic DNA Seqencer - which one is better?

Anna bounty at poczta.fm
Thu Sep 9 07:15:05 EST 2004


zachnilsen at yahoo.com (Zach) wrote in message news:<17bb234a.0409081709.39844cab at posting.google.com>...
> We have the ABI 377 sequencer and it's a pain to use.  I would not
> recommend this outdated technology to anyone.
> 
> Shortly, I'm going to use the 16 capillary ABI 3100 that is available
> in the lab across the hall.  Fellow students say that it requires
> minimal effort to get great sequences without going through the pain
> to cast gels and load samples manually.  There is no well-to-well
> leakage, because each sample runs in a separate capillary.
> 
Hi Zach,
I have a little problem...it costs a fortune... What do you think
about ABI PRISM 310? Is that very bad? and old? Do you know any more
sequencers? More automated of course.
Thanks a lot,
Anne



More information about the Methods mailing list