Strong contamination with ethidium bromide
(by sylvain.bauer from laposte.net)
Fri Jun 8 05:10:37 EST 2007
Have you the reference of this paper ? As you can expected I am very interest
Jim 3975 wrote:
> To get cancer, 16 years is nothing. People who start smoking at 16 don't
> lung cancer until 40, 50 years later. (Average age of lung cancer death is
> Bruce Ames showed in a PNAS paper in the seventies that smoking is more
> mutagenic than ethidum bromide (using fairly realistic doses of both).
>>"Prof. Piero Sestili" <sestili from uniurb.it> wrote in message
>>news:mailman.1372.1181135432.5139.methods from net.bio.net...
>>Nothing to do with the past contamination! Probably few EB molecules
>>penetrated to the germinative layer of your skin and most of it was
>>cleared by corneum. Just forget it! 16 years ago I noticed an EB stain
>>on my right hand, due to unexpectedly broken gloves: I'm still here,
>>writing with the same hand....
>>For the future simply wear two pairs of lattice gloves when using EB:
>>normal gloves do not protect so much...and go on with your PhD
> Methods mailing list
> Methods from net.bio.net
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Strong-contamination-with-ethidium-bromide-tf3868306.html#a11023760
Sent from the Bio.net - Methods mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Methods