RE to Jim 3975 - Strong contamination with ethidium bromide
(by bjhj from nospam.nl)
Fri Jun 8 15:20:38 EST 2007
In article <1181318252.993588.241960 from p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
peter <peter.ianakiev from gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 6:15 am, "Prof. Piero Sestili" <sest... from uniurb.it> wrote:
> > Dear Jim 3975,
> > of course, and as anybody in this field knows, you're right: my story
> > was simply to tranquillize this poor undergraduate student...I think
> > that your intervention got the opposite result! Another very relevant
> > aspect of this specific case (mine and undergraduate's one) is that we
> > are speaking of a SINGLE exposure, far less effective in terms of
> > carcinogenicity as compared to CHRONIC exposure.
> > By the way, if there's anybody who stained his hands with EB more than
> > 16 years ago, please come on and tell us your story!
> > Prof. Piero Sestili
> > Istituto di Farmacologia e Farmacognosia e
> > Centro di Ricerca sull'Attività Motoria
> > Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo"
> > Via "I Maggetti" 26
> > 61029 URBINO (PU)
> > Tel. 0722 303414; 0722 305524
> > Fax 0722 303401
> > -----Messaggio originale-----
> > Da: methods-boun... from oat.bio.indiana.edu
> > [mailto:methods-boun... from oat.bio.indiana.edu] Per conto di Jim 3975
> > Inviato: giovedì 7 giugno 2007 22.00
> > A: meth... from magpie.bio.indiana.edu
> > Oggetto: Re: Strong contamination with ethidium bromide
> > To get cancer, 16 years is nothing. People who start smoking at 16 don't
> > get
> > lung cancer until 40, 50 years later. (Average age of lung cancer death
> > is
> > ~70)
> > Bruce Ames showed in a PNAS paper in the seventies that smoking is more
> > mutagenic than ethidum bromide (using fairly realistic doses of both).
> > >"Prof. Piero Sestili" <sest... from uniurb.it> wrote in message
> > >news:mailman.1372.1181135432.5139.methods from net.bio.net...
> > >Nothing to do with the past contamination! Probably few EB molecules
> > >penetrated to the germinative layer of your skin and most of it was
> > >cleared by corneum. Just forget it! 16 years ago I noticed an EB
> > stain
> > >on my right hand, due to unexpectedly broken gloves: I'm still here,
> > >writing with the same hand....
> > >For the future simply wear two pairs of lattice gloves when using EB:
> > >normal gloves do not protect so much...and go on with your PhD
> > _______________________________________________
> > Methods mailing list
> > Meth... from net.bio.nethttp://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/methods
> EtBr is overrated IMHO, Friend of mine spilled about 250ml on himself,
> did not change clothes for a few hours and 14 years later he is fine,
> has 3 children and all is as normal as it can be. Don't stress
> yourselves with EtBr/gloves etc. In my experience most contaminations
> happened when people wore gloves....just wear gloves when handle
> acrilamide , DMSO, PMSF etc.
I used to have a supervisor who handled agarose gels containing EtBr
with his bare hands. More than 16 years ago. He used to say that indeed
the danger of EtBr is way overrrated: as with propidium iodide (which is
used to stain leaky DEAD cells), you actually need to actively open up
the cell membrane to get it into the cell. I have no other reference
with regard to EtBr to back this up, but his reasoning made a lot of
sense to me.
I use gloves, just because my institute requires it when handling this
type of chemicals.
More information about the Methods