(by irappley from scripps.edu)
Fri Apr 9 11:18:23 EST 2010
You could also try getting the 260/280 reading for your DNA in a
spectrophotometer to make sure it's relatively pure (you want a ratio
of 1.8-2.0). While you're at it, use the 260 reading to check the
concentration of your DNA prep.
Also, when you say that you've done all the troubleshooting, do you
mean that *you* have personally done it with your own hands, or that
your student has done it? I had a similar situation with a PCR that
suddenly stopped working for a technician, and in the end I had to
take over the troubleshooting myself to figure it out.
On Apr 9, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Peter Ellis wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, LeboMad wrote:
>> Hey Duncan thanks for the response. You're right it's 0.2mM it was
>> just a typing error. The problem is not really the multiplexing
>> because it worked in the past perfectly I could attach a gel or
>> two if
>> I could.
> OK, so something's changed. What? New batch of primers, new batch
> of DNA
> extraction reagents, new batch of enzyme / buffer / NTPs?
> I would try the following:
> 1) Positive control PCR with a known good primer pair + template, to
> confirm that the enzyme / buffers / nucleotides are OK. This needs
> to use
> a primer pair that's not part of the multiplex reaction, since you
> know if those primers are working OK.
> If the enzyme / buffers / nucleotides check out, then:
> 2) Test each of the primer pairs from the multiplex individually
> against a
> known good template (i.e. a DNA prep that's previously given a good
> This tells you if any of the individual primers has degraded or become
> contaminated with a PCR inhibitor.
> If the primer pairs from the multiplex are working OK, then the
> may lie in your DNA samples, so:
> 3) Test the failing DNA samples with some other primer pair that
> always give a band (e.g. beta actin for mammalian samples). This
> you if something is going wrong with the DNA preps.
> If you work through these stages in turn, that will confirm the
> of your PCR reagents, the primers and the template. Hopefully this
> pinpoint the problem.
> Methods mailing list
> Methods from net.bio.net
More information about the Methods