(by hroychow from nmsu.edu)
Tue Oct 9 08:57:02 EST 2018
Depends on your chelation needs.
EGTA is preferred if you do not want to reduce Mg++ activity.
Hiranya S. Roychowdhury, Ph.D.
Department of Science
Division of Science, Engineering and Math
NMSU-Dona Ana Community College
575 527 7725 (office)
Co-Chair, NMSU Faculty Grievance Review Board
Curriculum & Instruction Committee
Human Anatomy and Physiology Society<http://www.hapsweb.org/>
From: methods-bounces from oat.bio.indiana.edu <methods-bounces from oat.bio.indiana.edu> on behalf of kkerns.mobile from gmail.com <kkerns.mobile from gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 1:20:03 PM
To: methods from magpie.bio.indiana.edu
Subject: Re: EGTA
On Thursday, October 7, 1999 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Chong Wai Yin( Zhang Weixian) wrote:
> Hi people! Can anyone tell me are there any difference between using EDTA
> and EGTA in lysis buffer. Is the function of EGTA the same as EDTA? Thank
> you for answering.
> Kelvin Zhang
Anyone know of a chelator that can bind Ca2+ without binding Zn2+ as well? I can't find any in most charts.
Methods mailing list
Methods from net.bio.net
More information about the Methods