martin at broken-cross.demon.co.uk
Fri Aug 8 10:22:15 EST 1997
In article <5setjl$k3l$1 at upsn21.u-psud.fr>, Yves Dessaux
<Yves.Dessaux at isv.cnrs-gif.fr> writes
>In article <9708032033.AA06833 at alpha.incqs.fiocruz.br>,
>ivano at ALPHA.INCQS.FIOCRUZ.BR says...
>>Do you know any new methodology to differentiate gram positive from gram
>>negative bacteria. Sometimes it is very difficult to se the difference
>>on the microscope. I have an older technique, but I would like to see
>Boehringer - if I am right - sells a kit consisting of plastic
>stripes covered by a reagent that you only need to deep into a bacterial
>culture. It gives you the Gram type of the bacteria, though some
>false responses are sometimes seen (but a list of the organisms
>susceptible to yield a false response is provided with the kit).
I always DID have trouble with the Gram stain, but there again who
As far as I'm concerned, the stain is a very subjective test which is
(in the case of cell ageing/ gram variables) open to interpretation.
Modern test kits give a more reproducible response, but (I suppose) are
pulling away from Gram's original idea of staining, washing and
The ultimate 'gram-test' would be to measure membrane phospholipids
composition by GC-MS - giving a fingerprint for each species. But who's
got the money and time to do all that?
More information about the Microbio