Several questions on evolution, and mutation (rate)

Ram Samudrala ram at mbisgi.umd.edu
Wed Sep 4 18:07:25 EST 1996


Radford Neal (radford at cs.toronto.edu) wrote:

>There's a slight historical problem with this definition:  Darwin's
>theory of evolution was formulated without knowledge of genetics,

I am still perplexed by this.    If you're talking about the theories
Darwin published in  "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for
Life", I think it's the theory of natural selection, not the theory of
evolution.  If I recall right, he basically left variation (evolution)
to chance.

--Ram

me at ram.org  ||  http://www.ram.org  ||  http://www.twisted-helices.com/th
                                \  / 
                                 \/  Valine long
                                \/   and prosper.



More information about the Mol-evol mailing list