Modeling aqueous environments in X-PLOR. How?
Paul H Axelsen
axelsen at axe1.med.upenn.edu
Thu Jul 7 12:58:17 EST 1994
gwpoulos at acs4.bu.edu wrote:
: I've been trying to run some molecular dynamics simulations using the
: program X-PLOR. I'm trying to study a polypeptide with amphipathic
: alpha helices and I need to be able to look at polar and hydrophobic
: interactions. I was wondering how I might be able to model the
: molecule in an aqueous environment. Running the dynamics with
: lots of individual water molecules is too computationally expensive,
: since the program tries to also determine all of the dynamics of the
: water molecules. Any suggestions?
You've got a problem. Simulations with hundreds of explicit water molecules
already invoke many severe approximations, but do seem to yield realistic
results for well-conditioned problems. Various schemes to model water
implicitly inevitably require even more severe approximations, and will
make your results even less realistic (q.v. Axelsen et al, Biophysical
Journal 54:249-258, 1988). Within X-plor, the quickest (and dirtiest, but
still very clever) subterfuge is to use a distance-dependent dielectric.
I suggest you find an example of the kind of analysis you want to perform
in the literature, assess the cost in time and resources, and then proceed
as indicated. X-plor and CHARMM have the same ancestor, but you will find
a lot more solvent work has been done with CHARMM (or AMBER or GROMOS).
--
--------------------- axe at pharm.med.upenn.edu --------------------------------
Paul H. Axelsen MD .... .... . . . . 215-898-9238 (ofc)
Department of Pharmacology . . . .. . .. . 215-898-9766 (lab)
University of Pennsylvania .... ... . . . . . . 215-573-2236 (fax)
36th St. & Hamilton Walk . . . .. . .. 215-293-1659 (home)
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084 . .... . . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Molmodel
mailing list