From FloridaMycology from cs.com Fri Aug 8 15:16:57 2008 From: FloridaMycology from cs.com (FloridaMycology@cs.com) Date: Fri Aug 8 18:15:25 2008 Subject: [Mycology] Growing Portabello Mushrooms At Home Message-ID: <6ad44dc5-99d1-4926-ac40-c78fc9c8bddd@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> If you have been wanting to try and grow Portabello Mushrooms, I have just put up one of the articles I have published on this subject. Just go here: http://www.mushroomsfmrc.com/gpage13.html You will also find some more helpful information under "Spore Bank" off of our Main Menu. slp/fmrc From aloe from netrover.com Sun Aug 10 19:56:08 2008 From: aloe from netrover.com (J & J) Date: Mon Aug 11 11:15:05 2008 Subject: [Mycology] catenulate conidia conundrum? Message-ID: <489F8E28.3000903@netrover.com> Greetings, I'm hoping you would help me to determine whether the following fungal terminology relationship statements are correct: Gemmae refers to asexual propagules borne both singly and in chains. Chlamydospore is an old term for a singly borne gemma. Catenulate conidia is a current term for gemmae borne in chains. When referring to fungi (rather than liverworts etc), gemmae is a synonym of conidia. In general (plants or fungi), gemmae refer to asexual propagules. I'm wondering if I've misunderstood, for example if gemmae refer to conidial propagules only of a specific group like ascos or suchlike. Thanks in advance for your help! cheers, Juliet From geis.pa from pg.com Mon Aug 11 12:43:01 2008 From: geis.pa from pg.com (Geis, Phil) Date: Mon Aug 11 16:21:50 2008 Subject: [Mycology] RE: Mycology Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2 In-Reply-To: <200808111705.m7BH5CU08641@net.bio.net> References: <200808111705.m7BH5CU08641@net.bio.net> Message-ID: <3B4A11B0E75E524AB9EFDF2BDC5CE4F80183A9C8@bdc-emb005.na.pg.com> I'm not so familiar with its application in current mycological parlance. My old (1961) Ainsworth & Bisby's definition - gemma - a chlamydospore - esp. of a phycomycete. Phycomycete now being an obsolete term esp. referred to zygomycotina. -----Original Message----- From: mycology-bounces@oat.bio.indiana.edu [mailto:mycology-bounces@oat.bio.indiana.edu] On Behalf Of mycology-request@oat.bio.indiana.edu Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 1:05 PM To: mycology@magpie.bio.indiana.edu Subject: Mycology Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2 Send Mycology mailing list submissions to mycology@net.bio.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/mycology or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to mycology-request@net.bio.net You can reach the person managing the list at mycology-owner@net.bio.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Mycology digest..." Today's Topics: 1. catenulate conidia conundrum? (J & J) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:56:08 -0700 From: J & J Subject: [Mycology] catenulate conidia conundrum? To: mycology@magpie.bio.indiana.edu Message-ID: <489F8E28.3000903@netrover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Greetings, I'm hoping you would help me to determine whether the following fungal terminology relationship statements are correct: Gemmae refers to asexual propagules borne both singly and in chains. Chlamydospore is an old term for a singly borne gemma. Catenulate conidia is a current term for gemmae borne in chains. When referring to fungi (rather than liverworts etc), gemmae is a synonym of conidia. In general (plants or fungi), gemmae refer to asexual propagules. I'm wondering if I've misunderstood, for example if gemmae refer to conidial propagules only of a specific group like ascos or suchlike. Thanks in advance for your help! cheers, Juliet ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mycology mailing list Mycology@net.bio.net http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/mycology End of Mycology Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2 *************************************** From geis.pa from pg.com Mon Aug 11 12:43:01 2008 From: geis.pa from pg.com (Geis, Phil) Date: Mon Aug 11 16:21:56 2008 Subject: [Mycology] RE: Mycology Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2 In-Reply-To: <200808111705.m7BH5CU08641@net.bio.net> References: <200808111705.m7BH5CU08641@net.bio.net> Message-ID: <3B4A11B0E75E524AB9EFDF2BDC5CE4F80183A9C8@bdc-emb005.na.pg.com> I'm not so familiar with its application in current mycological parlance. My old (1961) Ainsworth & Bisby's definition - gemma - a chlamydospore - esp. of a phycomycete. Phycomycete now being an obsolete term esp. referred to zygomycotina. -----Original Message----- From: mycology-bounces@oat.bio.indiana.edu [mailto:mycology-bounces@oat.bio.indiana.edu] On Behalf Of mycology-request@oat.bio.indiana.edu Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 1:05 PM To: mycology@magpie.bio.indiana.edu Subject: Mycology Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2 Send Mycology mailing list submissions to mycology@net.bio.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/mycology or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to mycology-request@net.bio.net You can reach the person managing the list at mycology-owner@net.bio.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Mycology digest..." Today's Topics: 1. catenulate conidia conundrum? (J & J) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:56:08 -0700 From: J & J Subject: [Mycology] catenulate conidia conundrum? To: mycology@magpie.bio.indiana.edu Message-ID: <489F8E28.3000903@netrover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Greetings, I'm hoping you would help me to determine whether the following fungal terminology relationship statements are correct: Gemmae refers to asexual propagules borne both singly and in chains. Chlamydospore is an old term for a singly borne gemma. Catenulate conidia is a current term for gemmae borne in chains. When referring to fungi (rather than liverworts etc), gemmae is a synonym of conidia. In general (plants or fungi), gemmae refer to asexual propagules. I'm wondering if I've misunderstood, for example if gemmae refer to conidial propagules only of a specific group like ascos or suchlike. Thanks in advance for your help! cheers, Juliet ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mycology mailing list Mycology@net.bio.net http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/mycology End of Mycology Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2 ***************************************