neurobiological antinomies betray problems with hard sciences

Rifle River jstream at girch1.med.uth.tmc.edu
Tue Apr 19 13:07:14 EST 1994


In article <JY2vDmF.gokelly at delphi.com>, GREGORY C.O'KELLY
<gokelly at delphi.com> wrote:

>  And neuroscience muddles on while clinical neurologists 
> still check for 'reflex arcs' in their diagnoses before saying nothing can be 
> done.

Do you actually think that anyone on this list is taking you seriously?  If
so,
you are truly a clueless shithead!

If you are going to claim that current views and dogma are incorrect then 
present evidence which contradicts the current ideas (note: hand-waving
statements about "power lines and leukemia" are not considered good
evidence).

Not only do you make the claim that current dogma is wrong, but you imply
that clinical neurology would benefit from your new viewpoint.

If you make a claim then back it up with evidence.  Otherwise, take your
cluelessness elsewhere. 


Rifle River                      
jstream at girch1.med.uth.tmc.edu   
                                 



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list