Returned mail: User unknown (fwd)

Paul Kaufmann pkaufman at COMP.UARK.EDU
Tue Dec 6 11:54:05 EST 1994

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.


could get Vincents address to work.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 10:38:59 -0600
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON at comp>
To: pkaufman at comp
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

The original message was received at Tue, 6 Dec 1994 10:38:56 -0600
from pkaufman at localhost

   ----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
vamg6792 at  (unrecoverable error)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to
>>> RCPT To:<vamg6792 at>
<<< 550 <vamg6792 at>... User unknown
550 vamg6792 at User unknown

   ----- Original message follows -----

Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822
Content-ID: <Pine.3.89.9412061021.A29469 at comp>

Return-Path: pkaufman
Received: (from pkaufman at localhost) by (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA04606; Tue, 6 Dec 1994 10:38:56 -0600
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 10:38:55 -0600 (CST)
From: Paul Kaufmann <pkaufman at>
Subject: neurons
To: vamg6792 at
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9412061010.A29469-0100000 at comp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Mr. Mazzarella:
Greetings. I wondered if I have this misconcepton about neurons following 
a program on the Discovery channel the other evening. Basically, it 
described that whatever portion of the brain tissue that deteriorated 
would be replaced by differentiated neurological cells (dendrites). I am 
maybe misinformed but I thought nerve cells could not regenerate? And if 
experiments have shown this to be the case are the studies based on some 
kind of mylenoma hybrid? It just seemed a little too simple on the 
Discovery program and I don't think our understanding of human memory 
etc. has been that conclusive.
thank you for the reply.


More information about the Neur-sci mailing list