synapse weight modif. & glia role
ui22204 at sunmail.lrz-muenchen.de
Wed Apr 12 15:24:47 EST 1995
learning seems to be attributed to synapse weight changes,
whatever the cause. At least, that's what all the authorities
What happens in/at the synapse when it gets modified?
Some ad hoc hypotheses/flights of fancy:
1) it might be the postsynaptic membrane
(not bloody likely, since the protein density
(channels/neurotransmitterase) is very high
already (low-defect 2d crystal. Not too much
room for modulation, sorry.)
2) it might be the presynaptic membrane
(permeability to neurotransmitter packets? might be. but
what would be the modifications, if any? ideas?)
3) it might be the neurotransmitter vesicle density
(not likely, since it would be much too flimsy/transient medium
of information storage. This vesicle balance equilibrium would
be precarious and easily disturbed. Not a good choice, imo.)
4) it might be the mitochondria density in the vesicle
(quantization level way too coarse? What would be the
assumed possible modulation dynamic range, at all?
I would say not beyond 6 bits (64 levels). True?)
5) it might be synapse-internal proteins
(this would be tough. Especially, if one considers
immunostaining of large tissue specimens. Can DMSO
enhance membrane permeability enough to let such
large beasts (immunoglobulins) pass?)
I think the above list is pretty complete. Or have I overlooked
some other alternatives?
The main question would be: are any of above points true?
is there any evidence? Or is it all totally unknown?
Is there any literature on it? (A simple yes no yes response
on above 5 points would be very valuable, already).
The second big question would be: do the glia cell have any
information-processing task or are they simple auxiliary
And, since it is big question time: has anyone in this list
experience on abrasive STM/AFM imaging of frozen (immunostained?)
brain tissue at submicrometer resolution?
Thank you very much for any information on these matters,
More information about the Neur-sci