binglis at csbnmr.health.ufl.edu
Mon Apr 24 16:37:53 EST 1995
In article nar at newsbf02.news.aol.com, wisey at aol.com (WiseY) writes:
>There is some controversy both about the name and the cause of traumatic
>syrinxes versus classic syringomyelia which is believed to be related to
>enlargements of central canal or other cerebrospinal fluid carrying
>structures. Traumatic injury produces cysts at the injury site that may
>or may not communicate with the central canal. These cysts may be
>different from those that are classically associated with syringomyelia.
>To my knowledge, there has yet to be convincing evidence that shunting of
>a post-traumatic cyst has lasting beneficial effects. I would greatly
>appreciate hearing from anybody who believes or has evidence otherwise.
>Wise Young, M.D., Ph.D.
>NYU Medical Center, New York, NY
Does the tissue return to fill the cavity post-shunt? If so, does
it have a near-normal anatomy? Lastly, is there, then, a fundamental difference
in SM shunt outcome and hydrocephalus shunt outcome, at least anatomically?
More information about the Neur-sci