Machine for pc and macintosh that can read your mind (This is no a joke)
Tom Shafron
tshafron at students.wisc.edu
Tue Aug 8 12:48:13 EST 1995
In article <Pine.SGI.3.91.950808081948.11504A-100000 at golgi>,
jstrout at ucsd.edu says...
>
>"Brain waves" generally refers to the electric field generated
>collectively by the membrane potential of billions of neurons, as
>measured by an EEG (electroencephalogram) machine. This involves taping
>at least two, and often dozens of electrodes to the scalp. Even then,
>the signals are very small, and very difficult to interpret. At best,
>they can give a measure of the activity within general regions of the
>brain -- similar to the PET scans which have made much news in the last
>few years, but with much better temporal resolution and worse spatial
>resolution. But even an EEG cannot "read your mind" or your thoughts.
>With practice (and feedback), one can learn to control certain aspects of
>the signal to control devices. However, the EEG is very sensitive to
>electrical activity in the scalp muscles, and it seems likely that these
>EEG-controlled trains and such are controlled more by minute muscle
>tension than by "brain waves".
>
>As for "brain waves" and thoughts being read from your fingertip -- I
>don't think so. With practice, though, one might be able to control a
>device through subtle adjustments to muscular tension, skin conductivity,
>etc., which have been shown to be learnable through biofeedback. The
>subject might not even be aware of what's going on, and so might
>(erroneously) conclude that the machine is reading her thoughts. But
>this control would not come without practice, as the news story claimed.
>
>Just my $0.02 worth...
>
I'm sorry but I have been in recent contact with many people involved
in this project, and in just two words- your wrong.
Here is a correspondence I received from Stuart Dambrot, who has worked
with the prototype:
---------------------
You couldn't be more incorrect - or misleading - in your response. The
MindDrive referred to in the initial message (The Other 90 Percent
Technologies, Sausalito (415) 332-0433) uses an extremely complex
algorithm to recover far more information than GSR. As I mentioned in my
response to the initial query, I was involved in the announcement and have
worked with the prototype, and it is as far beyond GSR/EEG measurement as
cellular phones are beyond tin cans-and-string. If this seems a bit
overreactive, please recall that advances in science and technology are
often stifled or overlooked because of the power of uniformed opinion.
--------------------
It doesn't use traditoinal EEG or galvonic skin response methods to read
you electrical field. It works far faster. By the way I listed the number
of the company in the paragraph. If you still don't beleive me call them.
P.S. I understood that it didn't read your mind in reality, but in practice
it might as well.
Tom Shafron
tshafron at students.wisc.edu
More information about the Neur-sci
mailing list