Barriers in Neuroscience?

quark eet at
Fri Jun 9 14:59:49 EST 1995

In article <3r79v4$mcl at> Matt Jones <jonesmat at> writes:
>In article <3r5o4r$qed at> jeffrey brown gabbard,
>jbgabbar at writes:
>>As for "educating the public about science", I have no answers, but I do
>>have concerns. I saw a show on PBS about "scientific creationism". (a

>I think it's probably a good thing to teach these ideas (as well as
>creation stories from non-western non-christian cultures) *along side*
>accepted scientific ideas. As long as the accepted scientific ideas
>(which may or may not be the correct ideas) aren't ignored, this policy
>might give students a broader base of information to draw on in thinking
>about scientific issues. Maybe holding up the book of Genesis or the Epic
>of Gilgamesh next to the Origin of Species or A Brief History of Time is
>a good way of illustrating the difference (or hypothetical difference)
>between myth and science. It would probably make for a really interesting

But the Creationists want their model taught as an equally viable
SCIENTIFIC theory.  Usually evolution is ALREADY taught with a
kind of derogatory wink at the old belief in Genesis.

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:  What is this "nothing", or that which 
Eric Thomson		      :	 the sciences do not address?  Is it
eet at	      :  truly nothing, or is there something
University of New Hampshire   :  of interest to be found there?	
	 philosophy is an investigation of nothing

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list