Christopher T. Lovelace
CL1779A at american.edu
Mon Sep 25 11:59:45 EST 1995
In article <Pine.3.89.9509231144.C2700-0100000 at lex.lccc.edu>
rcb1 at LEX.LCCC.EDU (Ron Blue) writes:
>> On Fri, 22 Sep 1995, Christopher T. Lovelace wrote:
>> > Neal,
>> > info. packaged together. Instead, we seem to store bits and pieces that
>> > are sort of semi-loosely connected. When one "bit" emerges into
>> > consciousness, the connected bits are sucked up into consciousness with it.
>> > This can be demonstrated by looking at memory failure (i.e., "remembering"
>> > that your best friend in high school had a green '69 Mustang, only to
>> > find out that it was, in fact, a red '69 Mustang).
>This explaination I find the most interesting. Red/green is an opponnent-
>process. The mind may switch colors from the perceived color to the
>opponnent color. Any research on this? Ron Blue
The colors I chose in this illustration were arbitrary. Basically, what I
meant was that it is quite possible to have a vivid, detailed memory of
something, only to later find that some of the details have become distorted
over time (perhaps another friend had a green Mustang). Although, it might
be interesting to look at color memory mistakes and see if they are more
common in opponent colors.
Chris Lovelace cl1779a at american.edu
More information about the Neur-sci