regarding Duality theory

Sean Hill shill at
Mon Oct 14 10:52:20 EST 1996

In the time-honored tradition of following up to one's own post I should 
correct the following

I wrote:
>As it turned out the text was very poorly written including virtually no 
>references and defining no terms clearly.

In fact the text does include a bibliography but none of it contains 
references to anything which supports the claims of the paper.

Please excuse the error!

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list