micro mods to neurons

Kevin Spencer kspencer at s.psych.uiuc.edu
Tue Oct 15 01:24:10 EST 1996

kenneth paul collins <KPCollins at postoffice.worldnet.att.net> writes:

>...there is an unusual aspect of Duality Theory's understanding... 
>it is that, if the understanding is attacked and/or rejected, 
>before it is understood, the theory's position becomes 
>substantiated in the very act of "rejecting" it... (for those who 
>have it, see AoK, Ap10)...

It sounds as though Duality Theory cannot be disproven, which would
mean it's not a scientific theory -- its predictions must be falsifiable.
In that case, this newsgroup is really not an appropriate forum to
discuss this theory.

Kevin Spencer
Cognitive Psychophysiology Laboratory and Beckman Institute
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
kspencer at p300.cpl.uiuc.edu

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list