Poitical abuses in national research authority

Matt Jones jonesmat at ohsu.edu
Tue Oct 22 12:48:02 EST 1996


In article <54fhps$pfs at falcon.le.ac.uk> Dr E. Buxbaum, EB15 at le.ac.uk
writes:
>Other than that, you only amplify my point: there are already enough 
>dangerous and addictive substances around, so lets be carefull in 
>introducing new ones. 

Right. Let's review:

First you said:

In article <542fb3$ht0 at falcon.le.ac.uk> Dr E. Buxbaum, EB15 at le.ac.uk
writes:
>to divert such substances from legal to illegal use. And cannabis IS an
addictive drug, 
>contrary to the long disproved claims of its proponents. It can cause 
>psychological dependency 
>in "normal", and physical dependency in very high doses. 

Then, I said:

In article <545m4l$gqh at fremont.ohsu.edu> Matt Jones, jonesmat at ohsu.edu
writes:
>Dr. Buxbaum, 
>
>Would you mind providing citations to support your statement that
>marijuana is addictive?

Then, you said:

In article <54fhps$pfs at falcon.le.ac.uk> Dr E. Buxbaum, EB15 at le.ac.uk
writes:
>That it can cause psychological dependency is by now widely accepted 
>(note that "can" does not mean "will in every case"). The interesting
bit 
>is the physical addiction caused in very high doses. This was observed
in 
>certain asian countries, which virtually dried up the heroin market

<long non-referenced anecdote omitted>

And now, I repeat:
>Dr. Buxbaum, 
>
>Would you mind providing citations to support your statement that
>marijuana is addictive?

When I asked for citations, what I meant was a pointer to some public
archive of research findings (like a scientific journal), that everyone
can go look up, rather than having to take your statements at face value
without any critical consideration.

Thank you,
Matt



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list