Reply to James Howard--my take

MaryJaneG maryjaneg at aol.com
Mon Aug 11 10:38:16 EST 1997


> James Howard <jmhoward at sprynet.com>
>Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 13:52:48 -0500
>Message-ID: <33E77680.370D at sprynet.com>
>
>

As a sophomore year student, and as a woman, I believe your comments
(theories) were presented in an offensive way.  This is why, I believe,
you got the responses you did.  I would hope that your theories are proven
wrong conclusively, because it serves humanity no useful purpose to have
another form of hierarchy.

MaryJane

who doesn't have an opinion on your theory
because she isn't  _yet_ qualified to judge it
on its merits.



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list