Replicating LeVay

cmspecht at cmspecht at
Sat Jul 12 14:14:38 EST 1997

i only meant to imply that since he was so heavily criticised he would
surely attempt to replicate.  (i understand the science part) ;-).

colleen specht

On 9 Jul 1997, James Woodson wrote:

> Criticism is a part of scientific progress.  Don't feel sorry for LeVay,
> he's still the biggest name in the field among the laypublic.  One study,
> right to the top.  Who can criticise that?

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list